The Coalition for Gun Control/Pour le Controle des Armes

Archive for September, 2010

Fewer spousal homicides with long guns

Posted by cgccanada on September 13, 2010

Edmonton Journal, September 13, 2010

Re: “Chiefs’ case for long-gun registry fails; Flimsy evidence substantiates front-line cops’ vote to scrap it,” by Lorne Gunter, Aug. 29. We are members of the YWCA, the nation’s oldest and largest women’s service organization.  YWCA Canada is the country’s largest provider of shelter to women and children fleeing violence.  Each year more than 100,000 women and children leave their homes in Canada for violence against women shelters.  Many of them come through the doors of the 31 shelters operated by YWCAs across Canada.  Lorne Gunter is looking for evidence of the long-gun registry’s effectiveness.  In terms of violence perpetrated  against women, long guns are the most common type of firearm used in spousal homicides.  There has been a continuing decline in spousal homicides committed with rifles and shotguns, coincident with increasing use of the long-gun registry by Canadian police services. Over the past decade, 71 per cent of firearm spousal homicides involved rifles and shotguns. Only 24 per cent involved a handgun.  While spousal homicides with rifles and shotguns have decreased, spousal homicides by all other means have not.  The average number of women killed annually by their spouses without using a rifle or shotgun between 1995-98 was 52, the same figure for 2001-04 was 56 (Statistics Canada).  While there is much to criticize in how the registry was developed, we agree with the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police: the registry has made Canada a safer country.

Rheanna Sand, President
Julianna Charchun, Vice-President
YWCA Edmonton Board of Directors

Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Fewer+spousal+homicides+with+long+guns/3515902/story.html#ixzz0zPxTL8Nb

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Fewer spousal homicides with long guns

Gun control a peace issue

Posted by cgccanada on September 9, 2010

By Mae Popoff, The StarPhoenix September 9, 2010

Three national police associations — The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police, the Canadian Police Association and the Canadian Association of Police Boards — want to maintain the long gun registry.

The CBC website quotes Charles Momy, president of the Canadian Police Association that represents rank-and-file officers, as saying: “This should not be about us versus them. Or rural versus urban, or even police versus politicians.

“The firearms registry represents a valuable tool in assisting police in doing their job. It is a valuable tool, which has significant preventative and investigative value in keeping our communities safe.”

Gun control is a peace issue, because effective gun control leads to a reduction in homicides and in personal injury to the innocent.

The Saskatoon Peace Coalition supports the police and calls on Stephen Harper’s government to maintain the long gun registry. We ask our local MPs — Brad Trost, Lynne Yelich, Kelly Block and Maurice Vellacott — to do the right thing by voting against Bill C-391 when it is brought back to the House of Commons.

Mae Popoff
Advocacy co-ordinator
Saskatoon Peace Coalition

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/control+peace+issue/3498842/story.html#ixzz0z4VPjWrd

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gun control a peace issue

The gun registry and ignorance

Posted by cgccanada on September 8, 2010

Times Colonist, August 27, 2010

The government’s approach to the gun registry helps explain the Conservatives’ failure to win enough voters to form a majority government. Leave aside, for a moment, the core question of whether the registry should be retained or abolished.

MPs are to make a decision on that on Sept. 22. With the vote expected to be close, they should be seeking — and the government providing — all the information needed to make a smart, informed choice.

Instead, the Conservatives are sitting on a Canadian firearms program evaluation completed by the RCMP in February. At a May hearing of the Commons’ public safety committee, senior deputy RCMP commissioner Bill Sweeney said the report “was extremely positive” and should be released.

Not necessary, says the government. “Canadians don’t need another report to know that the long-gun registry is very efficient at harassing law-abiding farmers and outdoors enthusiasts, while wasting billions of taxpayer dollars,” a spokesperson for Public Safety Minister Vic Toews told the Toronto Star. “They don’t need another report to know that the registry does nothing to prevent crime.”

It’s a trite, wrong and dangerous response.

Trite, because the government has not even updated its talking points since it suppressed another positive report until after a preliminary vote last November. The comments were literally identical.

Wrong, because Canadians — aside from those on both sides of the debate whose minds are closed — do need useful information to help assess the costs and benefits of the gun registry.

And dangerous because of its underlying premise that ignorance is to be celebrated. The notion that prejudice or ideology should drive decisions while facts are ignored is extremely troubling.

There is room for debate on the issue. Any time the state asks for information that affects privacy, the public should ensure the program is necessary. And although the costs of maintaining the registry are small — about $4 million a year — all expenditures should be justified.

On balance, both the intrusion and the costs are easily justified. Obtaining the required licence and providing the information for the registry is not onerous. And the information is used about 14,000 times a day by police forces across Canada and about 2,500 times a day by police in B.C.

That’s why the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police has campaigned against the move to kill the registry. The chiefs say eliminating it would make it harder to fight crime, reduce public safety and put officers’ lives at risk. The Canadian Police Association, which represents front-line officers across the country, also supports the registry.

Their interest in maintaining the registry is understandable. An officer serving a warrant or investigating a dispute at a home has the ability to check for the presence of registered weapons — and learn how many and of what types — and take those factors into account. Stolen weapons can be traced back to their original owner, helping police solve crimes.

Criminals likely won’t register guns. But that allows police to seize unregistered weapons from those people.

Rifles and shotguns are useful tools. Some seven million firearms are registered in Canada (920,000 in B.C.).

But the registry doesn’t prevent people from owning weapons. It simply places them on a par with cars, which we all register without complaint.

This should not be a matter of ideology. The gun registry makes Canada a safer place for everyone — especially police officers. It should not be killed.

© Copyright (c) The Victoria Times Colonist

http://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/registry+ignorance/3449557/story.html?cid=megadrop_story#ixzz0ywiup48x

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The gun registry and ignorance